![]() Compare the resulting interpolated images.Process the raw file(s) using each raw processor's default (i.e.The usual way to compare raw processors is to: This is the reason why all raw processors provide default settings that include image enhancement algorithms: "auto-levels", a tone curve to increase mid-tone contrast, sharpening, highlight recovery, and so forth. Scene-referred output tends to be flat and unappealing. "Radiometrically correct, scene-referred output" means the channel values in the interpolated image are proportional to the amount of light that was recorded in the raw file. The usual raw processor review: enhanced vs radiometrically correct, scene-referred output Offer some raw file repair options (automatic repair of dead pixel and chromatic aberration, dark frame subtraction, and etc) that my floating point version of dcraw doesn't have.Provide the convenience of a gui - it's nice to be able to see the interpolated image before it's saved to disk!.Produce radiometrically correct output that's at least as good as my floating point version of dcraw.My personal goal while writing this review is to see if any of today's high-powered, multi-functional free and open source raw processors might: I've been using dcraw, and more recently my floating point version of dcraw, as my "go to" raw processor for many years. However, this review only covers raw processing, by which I mean raw interpolation (demosaicing) and also any denoising techniques that are only applicable to raw images. Some of the raw processors are also digital asset management (DAM) programs. Introduction: evaluating raw processors What this review does and doesn't coverĪll of the raw processors considered on this page can perform various post-interpolation image enhancements. By default process images thru an RGB and/or the CIELAB color space?.Use linear gamma, simple matrix ICC camera profiles?.All image enhancements can be disabled?.Options related to radiometrically correct, scene-referred output.Introduction: evaluating raw processors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |